PLOS ONE2014-01-06 2:07 AM

Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding 大科学和小科学:科技如何影响投资规模


Agencies that fund scientific research must choose: is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite researchers, or small grants to many researchers? Large grants would be more effective only if scientific impact increases as an accelerating function of grant size. Here, we examine the scientific impact of individual university-based researchers in three disciplines funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). We considered four indices of scientific impact: numbers of articles published, numbers of citations to those articles, the most cited article, and the number of highly cited articles, each measured over a four-year period. We related these to the amount of NSERC funding received. Impact is positively, but only weakly, related to funding. Researchers who received additional funds from a second federal granting council, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, were not more productive than those who received only NSERC funding. Impact was generally a decelerating function of funding. Impact per dollar was therefore lower for large grant-holders. This is inconsistent with the hypothesis that larger grants lead to larger discoveries. Further, the impact of researchers who received increases in funding did not predictably increase. We conclude that scientific impact (as reflected by publications) is only weakly limited by funding. We suggest that funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive. 








0 Following 5 Fans 0 Projects 90 Articles


AbstractAgencies that fund scientific research must choose: is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite researchers, or small grants to ma

Read More

Abstract The role of genetically modified (GM) crops for food security is the subject of public controversy. GM crops could contribute to food product

Read More

Abstract 论文摘要 Background Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly increased survival among HIV-positive adults in the United State

Read More

AbstractThe U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget expansion from 1998 through 2003 increased demand for biomedical research, raising relative

Read More

Abstract Kawaii (a Japanese word meaning “cute”) things are popular because they produce positive feelings. However, their effect on behavior remains

Read More

Abstract The diversity of life is one of the most striking aspects of our planet; hence knowing how many species inhabit Earth is among the most funda

Read More

Abstract Lateralized brain regions subserve functions such as language and visuospatial processing. It has been conjectured that individuals may be le

Read More

Abstract Background and Aims Questions over the clinical significance of cannabis withdrawal have hindered its inclusion as a discrete cannabis ind

Read More