Chimpanzee choice rates in competitive games match equilibrium game theory predictions

Abstract
The capacity for strategic thinking about the payoff-relevant actions of conspecifics is not well understood across species. We use game theory to make predictions about choices and temporal dynamics in three abstract competitive situations with chimpanzee participants. Frequencies of chimpanzee choices are extremely close to equilibrium (accurate-guessing) predictions, and shift as payoffs change, just as equilibrium theory predicts. The chimpanzee choices are also closer to the equilibrium prediction, and more responsive to past history and payoff changes, than two samples of human choices from experiments in which humans were also initially uninformed about opponent payoffs and could not communicate verbally. The results are consistent with a tentative interpretation of game theory as explaining evolved behavior, with the additional hypothesis that chimpanzees may retain or practice a specialized capacity to adjust strategy choice during competition to perform at least as well as, or better than, humans have.

Full Article: 
http://www.nature.com/srep/2014/140605/srep05182/abs/srep05182.html

KEYWORDS

SHARE & LIKE

COMMENTS

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

California Institute of Technology

0 Following 0 Fans 0 Projects 4 Articles

SIMILAR ARTICLES

AbstractThe capacity for strategic thinking about the payoff-relevant actions of conspecifics is not well understood across species. We use game theory

Read More

AbstractIsolating microbes carrying genes of interest from environmental samples is important for applications in biology and medicine. However, this i

Read More

AbstractThe corpus callosum, with its ∼200 million axons, remains enigmatic in its contribution to cognition and behaviour. Agenesis of the corpus call

Read More

AbstractSocial behaviours, such as aggression or mating, proceed through a series of appetitive and consummatory phases1 that are associated with incre

Read More