The Federal Reserve’s effort to boost bank lending during the recent financial crisis by providing short-term loans worked quite well, a new study argues.
Examining novel data released after the crisis, researchers found that banks’ increased use of the Fed’s Discount Window and Term Auction Facility (TAF) was associated with increased lending to firms and households.
“There were many news reports during that time that banks were hoarding cash from government interventions and keeping it for themselves,” says Jennifer Dlugosz, assistant professor of finance at Washington University in St. Louis’ Olin Business School. “Our results show, at least in the context of these programs, that was not the case. Banks that received funds did increase their lending.”
Since its inception, the Federal Reserve has served as a “lender of last resort” to the banking system via the Discount Window, by providing temporary, short-term funding to solvent banks experiencing liquidity problems.
In 2007-08, as concerns about subprime mortgages grew, banks found their usual market sources of funding more difficult to come by. In response, the Federal Reserve extended Discount Window loans, reduced the cost of credit and established the Term Auction Facility, which aimed to provide funds in an auction format, to stabilize the financial system and increase banks’ lending.
The research team set out to see if this effort worked. Their study, available online through the Social Science Research Network, answers three questions:
Which banks used funds from the Federal Reserve during the crisis?
Did these funds substitute for or complement other funding sources?
Did banks use these funds to increase their lending?
Despite the long history of the Fed’s role as a lender of last resort, these questions have not been studied previously because the banks receiving funds from the Federal Reserve historically have been kept secret.
Information on crisis-time borrowing only became public due to disclosure requirements in the Dodd-Frank Act and Freedom of Information Act requests by Bloomberg News and Fox Business Network.
The researchers found that Discount Window and TAF use was widespread. Twenty percent of small banks and more than 60 percent of large banks took advantage of the programs. Some banks relied on the Fed quite heavily, with top borrowers using these programs to fund as much as 5 to 15 percent of assets daily, on average, over the crisis period.
For small and large banks alike, an increase in Discount Window and TAF funding from the Fed was associated with increased lending. Those results held for both short-term and long-term loans, and for virtually all types of lending aside from residential real estate lending.
A common criticism of government support is that it creates “moral hazard.” In other words, there is concern that banks expecting to receive government support will take more risk than they otherwise would.
However, using detailed data on borrower quality and lending terms that are available for a subset of banks in the sample, the study found loan quality stayed the same or improved while contract terms remained unchanged.
Researchers from the University of South Carolina, DePaul University, and Case Western Reserve University coauthored the study.
《The Federal Reserve's Discount Window and TAF Programs: 'Pushing on a String?'》, Published on Journal 《SSRN》in April 25, 2014.