verahe2014-07-14 5:13 PM

SMJ Best Paper Winners 1993-2013 Introduction

最后两段,方法论,其实apply to 所有学科。

 

In parallel, though, a common point arises among the best paper winners, which reflects a common core to our discipline. This common core has four key elements. First, each of the papers begins with a novel, precise, and relevant question about the nature of strategy – whether involving individuals, organizations, and/or competitive and social environments. Second, each of the papers then develops a nuanced and deep argument about possible answers to the central question. Third, each of the papers then assesses the baseline logic carefully to generate and test answers, sometimes through statistical analysis, sometimes different forms of modelling, sometimes through logical judgment. Fourth, each of the papers thinks carefully about the boundary conditions to the generality and limits of the answers. This set of four elements – from question, through logic and answers, to boundaries -- reflects the core philosophy of our discipline.

In our view, the first and last steps of this sequence – questions and boundaries -- are particularly important. The best paper prize winners ask important questions that push the boundaries of the field and open doors to new territories. They then seek to assess both the generalizations of where they have pushed the boundaries and the limits beyond which further research needs to explore. We hope that creating the opportunity for scholars to delve into these papers – whether for the first time or as opportunities to seek new insights from work we have read in the past – we will encourage new research within the scope of each paper. Even more, we hope that we will encourage scholars to embrace the philosophy that links this wonderful body of work – that asking important questions is the critical starting point in our field and, in turn, that the process of deriving reliable answers to the questions is partly about completing paths of research but much more about articulating insights that expand our horizons and stimulate other important questions.

KEYWORDS

SHARE & LIKE

COMMENTS

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

verahe

浙江大学企业管理研究生、工商管理本科。研究方向:企业战略演化、人力资源和组织行为、创新行为、公司治理等。其余感兴趣领域:经济学、心理学、社会学、历史、医学等

15 Following 72 Fans 0 Projects 108 Articles

SIMILAR ARTICLES

国际上:最好的三个:American Economic Review、Econometrica、Journal of Political Economy国内:《经济研究》和《经济学季刊 》国际上经济学期刊排名参考:顶尖期刊:American Economic ReviewEconometricaJou

Read More

1. First Tier Journals1.1. Management (泛管理领域)1.1.1. Academy of Management Journal (AMJ)1.1.2. Academy of Management Review (AMR)1.1.3. Administrative S

Read More

1. The Glass Slipper: "Incorporating" Occupational Identity in Management Studies (水晶鞋:将职业身份纳入管理研究)2. Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search (众包

Read More

这篇文章研究的是由群体内部经济状况变化带来的群体间的冲突现象。首先研究的模型显示,如果某个群体收入偏低,提高这个群体的收入水平,会导致针对这个群体的暴力侵害增多,但会降低从这个群体产生的暴力冲突。然后文章将这个模型应用到印度的印度教和穆斯林教之间冲突问题。通过分析实际数据,主要的研究结果是:如果增加穆

Read More

小编备注:一共50篇。好多经典的!代理理论、高阶理论、承诺升级、管家理论、利益相关者理论、组织学习、社会资本、吸收能力……还有对授权、工作-家庭角色冲突、制度环境、组织间信任与合作、组织发展与变革、创业、团队创造力和多样性的研究等等,方法(论)上,从案例研究建立理论、理论贡献的构成要素、从过程数据建构

Read More

这项研究针对研发项目团队,探究团队层面的知识共享是否调节了个体层面专业知识相异性对个体员工创造性的影响。这里,专业知识相异性,是指团队中的一个焦点员工与他或她的队员之间所具备的专长和知识的差异性,在这项研究中,专业知识相异性的操作化定义,是按照每个成员所属的研发部门来定义的。作者进行了两项研究,研究对

Read More

1. Building Better Theory: Time and The Specification of When Things Happen (建构更好的理论:时间以及详细说明事件何时发生)2. Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive G

Read More

     这篇文章在实验环境下测试了Lagos和Wright(2005)关于货币交换的模型。这个模型有一个独特的货币均衡和一个非货币物物交换均衡连续统。研究发现被试们更喜欢货币均衡而避免物物交换连续统。研究还检验了没有货币存在的其他版本模型,这些模型的均衡都只涉及非货币物物交换。最终研究结果显示,基于

Read More

这篇文章通过使用潜意识道德和不道德启动效应来检验潜意识加工对伦理行为的影响,从而扩展了现有的理论。传统的行为伦理学研究认为伦理决策是理性而审慎的,但Reynolds(2006)的研究则提出了一个双重加工模型(dual process model),包括了意识和潜意识两部分。潜意识加工对伦理行为的影响是

Read More

证券分析师对公司每股盈余(EPS)的预测构成了这些公司重要的业绩目标。公司管理者试图影响分析师的预测值,同时实现EPS目标。借鉴印象管理领域的前人文献,研究针对公司前期的业绩目标如何影响管理者的印象管理活动,提出了一系列假设。这些活动包括发布预测指引、召开分析师会议、发布新闻稿等。这项研究同时考察管理

Read More