University of California Davis2014-10-03 4:29 PM

Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1

ABSTRACT

Globally, food-producing animals con- sume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered (GE) crop biomass. This review briefly summarizes the scientific literature on performance and health of animals consum- ing feed containing GE ingredients and composition of products derived from them. It also discusses the field experience of feeding GE feed sources to commercial livestock populations and summarizes the suppliers of GE and non-GE animal feed in global trade. Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are compa- rable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines. United States animal agriculture produces over 9 billion food- producing animals annually, and more than 95% of these animals consume feed containing GE ingredients. Data on livestock productivity and health were collated from publicly available sources from 1983, before the intro- duction of GE crops in 1996, and subsequently through 2011, a period with high levels of predominately GE animal feed. These field data sets, representing over 100 billion animals following the introduction of GE crops, did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in live- stock health and productivity. No study has revealed any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals. Because DNA and protein are normal components of the diet that are digested, there are no detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GE components in milk, meat, and eggs following consump- tion of GE feed. Globally, countries that are cultivating GE corn and soy are the major livestock feed exporters. Asynchronous regulatory approvals (i.e., cultivation approvals of GE varieties in exporting countries occur- ring before food and feed approvals in importing coun- tries) have resulted in trade disruptions. This is likely to be increasingly problematic in the future as there are a large number of “second generation” GE crops with altered output traits for improved livestock feed in the developmental and regulatory pipelines. Additionally, advanced techniques to affect targeted genome modifi- cations are emerging, and it is not clear whether these will be encompassed by the current GE process-based trigger for regulatory oversight. There is a pressing need for international harmonization of both regulatory frameworks for GE crops and governance of advanced breeding techniques to prevent widespread disruptions in international trade of livestock feedstuffs in the future.

Full Article

KEYWORDS

SHARE & LIKE

COMMENTS

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

University of California Davis

0 Following 0 Fans 0 Projects 7 Articles

SIMILAR ARTICLES

AbstractObjectiveTo determine whether state-mandated minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in California hospitals had an effect on reported occupat

Read More

AbstractBluetongue virus (BTV) is the cause of an economically important arboviral disease of domestic and wild ruminants. The occurrence of BTV infect

Read More

AbstractDiet has a strong influence on the intestinal microbiota in both humans and animal models. It is well established that microbial colonization i

Read More

SignificanceUnlike germplasm banks, on-farm conservation allows crops to evolve continuously in response to changing conditions. Agricultural adaptatio

Read More

Abstracttalpid2 is an avian autosomal recessive mutant with a myriad of congenital malformations, including polydactyly and facial clefting. Although p

Read More