悠悠2014-12-29 4:20 PM

First Sale Doctrine

The article entitled “Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Omega, S.A.: Extraterritorial applicability of the first sale doctrine” was published in the Berkeley Technology Law Journal on December 24, 2010, by Margaret Grazzini. The article introduced the lawsuit between Costco Whole Sale Corporation (hereafter “Costco”) and Omega S.A. (hereafter “Omega”). The plaintiff, Omega, is a luxury watchmaker based in Switzerland that distributes its watches through authorized retailers. The Omega watches feature a copyrighted globe design on the back side of the watches. Defendant Costco obtained some of the Omega watches through the grey market and sold them in Costco’s stores at almost 50% less than the price that they are sold n the US. Omega sued for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C § 106(a) and 602(a). Costco asserted that the first sale doctrine precluded any infringement claims against it1. In Omega v. Costco, the trial court ruled for Costco, the Ninth Circuit reversed and ruled that the first sale doctrine does not apply to imported goods manufactured abroad. The case went to the Supreme Court. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision in this case. The remaining justices split 4-4, which means that the court is not making a ruling that clarifies or speaks to the issues brought up2.

Under the first sale doctrine, codified in 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), the owner of any particular copy “lawfully made under this title” is allowed to resell or transfer that good without authorization from or further obligation to the copyright holder. The Ninth Circuit Court believed the description “lawfully made under this title” in first sale doctrine meant all goods made outside United States are not under protection of US law.” Thus people who had the copies which were manufactured in foreign countries could not import and resell them in the United States under the correct interpretation of the first sale doctrine.

Earlier in Quality King v. L’anza case, the Supreme Court held that the first sale doctrine endorsed in § 109(a) is applicable to imported copies1. Quality King v. L’anza involved domestically manufactured copies sold to a party outside the United States and then imported --- a round trip importation. However, Omega v. Costco involved copies manufactured outside the United States and then imported. These two cases make it apparent that, while the location of the sale may not matter, the location of the manufacture will impact the applicability of the first sale doctrine. I do not think it is correct to narrow the first sale doctrine based on where the copies were manufactured. This holding will exclude all copies made outside the United States, even those made by or with the authorization of the United States copyright owners.

Commerce in copies of copyrighted works constitutes a substantial part of the United States economy. Copyright protection has a far reaching effect on commerce. Commerce in copyrighted works depends on the confidence that retailers and consumers will be free from downstream restraints imposed by a copyright owner. The right is secured by the first sale doctrine2. Mass retailers in United States, such as Target corporation, attract customers by offering high quality goods at reasonable and discount prices. Target has a substantial percentage of products that are produced and first sold abroad and imported. Also, many retailers purchase goods for resale from wholesale importers and distributors, who arbitrage goods to take advantage of lower foreign pricing. The first sale doctrine is very important to these retailers. They need confidence that these foreign-manufactured goods can be purchased and resold in United States commerce free from claims of copyright infringement. So narrowing the scope of the first sale doctrine, as the Ninth Circuit did in Omega v. Costco, will create fears of copyright liability among these mass or small retailers. They may face copyright infringement lawsuits that will cost tens of billions of dollars annually because of the narrow application of the first sale doctrine.

The first sale doctrine also gives rise to aftermarkets for many copyrighted works. Aftermarkets for rental and purchase enable more consumers to enjoy a greater number of copyrighted works, and spread access to cultural works to persons with lower incomes. The selling prices for movie DVDs are at least ten times more than their rental prices. Consumers can get “like new” used books on Amazon for half of their original prices. For students, the prices of textbooks are so high that they will usually try to get used books rather than buy them directly from a book store with their recommended price. So all of these commerce activities are important and we should make sure to keep their currently lawful status.

With the decision made in the Omega v. Costco case, any copyright owner could end commercial activities, such as DVD rental and used book selling, by moving production overseas. Eliminating first sale privileges for imports will reduce the value proposition from the purchase of copyrighted works. While consumers know that the books, DVDs and video games they purchase can be traded, given away, or sold, they would be more likely to resell or trade in their used copies to fuel purchases of other copyrighted copies. Thus, the loss of first sale resale rights likely will reduce purchasing in primary market sectors, both by reducing the initial incentive to purchase and denying consumers the proceeds from sales of used books.

With the argument above, I believe it is not correct to exclude all copies manufactured overseas from being protected by the US copyright law.

Even if the Ninth Circuit held that first sale doctrine is applicable to both copies manufactured domestically and internationally, I do not think the ruling for Omega v. Costco should be reversed. Costco obtained the Omega watches through the grey market – Omega sold the watches to authorized distributors, third parties bought the watches, sold them to the New York Company ENE limited, and ENE sold the watches to Costco. Omega did not authorize the importation or resale in the United States1. Suppose Costco won the suit under this unauthorized status, hundreds of other retailers or wholesale companies will use the same channel to get goods from the grey market. Those product companies will lose their control to the prices of their goods. So I think the first sale doctrine should be redefined to protect product companies from unfair competition from the grey market.







主编 唧唧堂 内容运营

唧唧堂主编,热爱八卦和运动,学术的话最近最感兴趣的是各种医学的研究~~欢迎大家加我个人微信:hiyouyouxuan, 一起探讨如何把唧唧堂变得更好~~

11 Following 23 Fans 0 Projects 56 Articles


几十年的互联网发展已经证明其是人们信息共享强有力渠道,并且开始成为实现所谓的“群众的智慧”的重要根据地。互联网经济新近的一个重要的趋势是,各种评价系统不断涌现,这种评价系统有针对餐馆酒店的,比如大众点评; 有评价旅游景点的,比如穷游网; 有打算评价教授大学的,比如唧唧堂,甚至有评价宗教人士的,小编暂时

Read More

我们都知道,即使在产业内,公司的生产率也是不同的。 在国家层面这种差别更大,特别是当我们比较处于不同经济发展阶段的国家时。另外,在资本的边际收益产品中我们也可以发现这种生产率的差别。 该论文发表之前已经有研究试图从不同行业国家经济变量参数的边际产品波动中识别出资源的不当配置程度,以及这种不当配置对社会

Read More

没有一个城市是单一产业的城市,就连好莱坞或者硅谷都不是。 同样,也没有任何一个城市是拥有完全不同产业的。 传统的城市系统模型聚焦的城市非常两极化,要么研究产业完全专业化的城市(completely specialized city),要么研究完全不同的城市(completely diverse cit

Read More

人类可以通过查看一个概念(concept)的一个或者几个简单的例子(instances)就能够识别出更多其他例子,更具体说,例如人第一次看到一头猪,就能识别这头猪的一些概念特征,耳朵很大,鼻子突出,大鼻孔等等,当人得知长这样的物体是猪之后,下次他去农场,就能将猪认出来,就算那里还有更多其他家畜。 这是

Read More


Read More

每年12月,英国伦敦的Digital Science公司都会评选出该年最热门的100篇论文,他们的评论标准,并不是根据论文发表杂志的影响因子,而是利用他们自己建立的Altmetric评价系统, 基于论文在媒体、博客、推特、脸书和维基百科等类非学术共同体被引用或转发的情况而定的,所以选出的论文不仅有重大

Read More

Moodle 设计开发是依据以下对 “社会构建教育”的理解展开的。 对社会教育的理解包括以下几个方面,我觉得对唧唧堂的发展应该也有知道意义。 Constructivism (构建主义) From a constructivist point of view, people actively

Read More

悠悠 Sep 06 | 06:40 PM


创造产业是许多科技人员的梦想,虽然这很不容易做到。一位很优秀的博士生,导师是“大牛”,在国际学术界有一定知名度。博士生已在IEEE Trans发表了多篇论文,有的还在国际会议上得奖。但面临毕业后的选择,仍然很艰难。因为他清楚,继续堆SCI可以在科技界呆下去,但处在应用科学界,原创性贡献的方向在哪里?与

Read More

This is a lay summary for the article <Repeated Interactions and Improved Outcomes: An Empirical Analysis of Movie Production in the United States> tha

Read More


Read More